There are a number of ways to test how well a person hears. In the clinic you may try some rather crude screening methods. At other time you may need to refer patients to trained audiologists for special testing. This section is aimed at introducing you to the major ways in which hearing is tested.
At the end of this section, you should be able to:
1. Describe the effects of different degrees of hearing loss on speech and language
2. Describe the various methods used for evaluating hearing loss
5. Describe the several approaches to rehabilitation available for hearing impaired individuals.
Hearing loss may be categorized by degree. This table below does not take into account some important variables, including age of the individual which, as we will see later impacts critically on language development.
Accurate otologic diagnosis often depends on reliable and accurate tests of hearing. The results of such tests help identify the sites of lesions and and point to strategies for intervention and treatment. Patients may be screened in a relatively course way, or may be evaluated using more sophisticated testing procedures.
Some simple procedures can be carried out to give clues as to the nature of the hearing loss:
In conversation, how does the person respond when you speak to him/her? Does the person have to see your face to understand what you are saying? Does the person tend to
favor one or the other ear? Using a tuning fork may help evaluate the nature of a hearing loss short of an audiologic examination.
The basic battery of audiometric tests normally includes pure-tone testing of threshold by both air and bone conduction, speech reception threshold (SRT), and speech discrimination (SDS). These tests normally require the cooperation of the subject whose response to a sound is indicated by some gesture (e.g. raised hand). Testing is typically carried out in a sound-attenuated room with the subject listening to carefully calibrated sounds.
Threshold sensitivity testing using airborne pure tones.
Testing is done using earphones thereby allowing each ear to be examined independently. Tones are reduced in intensity until they are no longer heard, at which point the examiner alternately raises and lowers the intensity of the sound until a just-detectable threshold is determined. This is repeated at several frequencies within the audible range and the results plotted as an audiogram. The shape of the curve is a measure of the frequency sensitivity of both the middle ear and the inner ear. To differentiate between middle ear (conductive) and inner ear (sensorineural) components to a hearing loss it is necessary to conduct additional tests.
Here testing is done with a vibrator placed somewhere on the skull (usually the mastoid). The testing and plotting procedures are the same as with air conduction testing. In this case, however, sound is transmitted directly to the cochlea via bone conduction, thereby by-passing the transmission mechanism of the middle ear. Thus, audiograms obtained using both bone and air conducted sounds provide information about the integrity of both the middle and inner ears. Difficulty in hearing only air conducted sounds results in a separation of the bone and air conduction audiograms - the so-called "air-bone gap".
The threshold for hearing easily-recognized two-syllable words (e.g. baseball, iceberg, eardrum) is called the speech reception threshold(SRT). Since speech is made up of pure tones, this threshold should be very close to pure tone thresholds up to about 4 kHz, which is the range offrequencies occupied by most normal speech sounds.
Speech discrimination, as opposed to speech sensitivity, is the person's ability to not only hear words but to identify them. The procedure includes presentation of 50 selected monosyllabic words at an easily detectable intensity level. The speech discrimination score (SDS) is the percentage of words correctly identified. Pathology of the inner ear, auditory nerve, and/or central auditory pathways can affect this score. The ability of an individual to discriminate speech is not well predicted by the pure-tone audiogram. An individual may hear a sound well enough, but the neural signals may be altered to the extent that the sound is unintelligible.
Individuals suffering only a conductive hearing loss will be able to identify words if the sound is loud enough. For persons with sensorineural hearing loss, there is a marked drop in the score without a proportionate loss of pure-tone or speech sensitivity.
Infants indulge in vocal play within the first year of life. If they fail to respond to their auditory world in this time, a parent will often ask questions about the child's ability to hear. Perhaps another year passes before the question is raised of why the child fails to speak. This early period in the child's life is critical for the development of normal communication skills which, if not achieved then, will often result in lifelong communication handicaps. Thus, newborns at risk for hearing loss and those whose hearing is suspect can, and should, be accurately evaluated at the earliest time. Accurate hearing tests can be conducted at any time in a person's life. Obviously, testing procedures used successfully on adults may have to be modified for use on infants and small children
Infants respond to sounds in the free field or through earphones with facial responses (grimaces, smiles, brow raising) or with head turning. A 3-month old child sitting in its mother's lap may exhibit a startle response to sound. A 6-month old child may initiate or cease activity upon hearing a stimulus. These responses are difficult to quantify, but in the hands of an experienced person, can give clues as to the ability of that infant or child to hear sounds. When testing young children it is necessary to remember to apply standards and stimuli appropriate for the child's developmental level.
By 24 months of age other test strategies can be used based on the child's natural curiosity about objects in the environment. Play audiometry is a technique used that makes a game of the test and may be used up to the age of about 6 depending on the abilities of the child. This technique allows for tests of pure-tone detection and speech sensitivity and intelligibility.
Testing is also possible in the more difficult situations in which the child is 1) profoundly deaf, 2) developmentally disabled, 3) aphasic, 4) emotionally disturbed (e.g., autistic), 5) deaf-blind, or some combination of these disorders. Specially designed behavior tests include those using positive reinforcement (candy, toys) to reward appropriate responses to auditory stimuli.
Testing may also be objective in the sense that it is not required that the subject consciously respond to the sound. In these tests, physiological responses are monitored and, in general, the cooperation of the patient is not needed. There are several special reasons for using such tests. First, they are designed to test the integrity of specific parts of the auditory pathway. Second, they can be used to test patients who are unable or unwilling to cooperate with hearing examiners (e.g., infants, mentally retarded persons, malingerers). Commonly used methods include:
Tympanometry
This method assesses the mobility or compliance of the tympanic membrane and thereby provides important information about the function of the middle ear including the tympanic membrane, ossicles, and Eustachian tube.
Electrocochleography
Cochlear and auditory nerve electrical activity can be recorded from human patients from electrodes advanced through the tympanic membrane and placed on the otic capsule. This method allows assessment of cochlear and auditory nerve function independent of the patient's subjective response. Two electrical events are recorded from the inner ear in response to sound: the cochlear microphonic (receptor) potential and the compound action potential of the auditory nerve. Distortion of the waveform of either of these potentials is an indication of inner ear disease.
Evoked potential
A silver disc electrodes taped to the skull record the electrical activity of the brain (EEG). When a brief acoustic stimulus (e.g., a click or short tone burst) is presented to the ear there is a synchronized burst of action potentials generated in the auditory nerve which spreads throughout the central auditory pathway. Because of its very low amplitude (in the microvolt range) this wave of activity is generally buried in the EEG and can only be recovered using computerized signal-averaging techniques. When such methods are employed the complex waveform recorded is called the auditory evoked potential and it includes contributions from many sites that are activated sequentially in time along the auditory pathway. An averaged waveform has multiple peaks and valleys stretched out over a period of several hundred milliseconds after the presentation of the acoustic stimulus. By examining only certain epochs of the waveform it is possible to study the integrity of certain portions of the auditory pathway.
The time period most commonly studied covers the first 12 msec after the stimulus is presented to the ear and, hence, represents the electrical activity evoked in neurons in the auditory nerve and brainstem. This is referred to in the experimental and clinical literature as the brainstem evoked response (BER) or averaged brainstem response (ABR). Other time periods reveal later waves which represent activity generated in higher centers of the auditory pathway including the auditory areas of cerebral cortex. This technique is very useful in studying hearing loss of central origin in cooperative patients. It is essential in determining the hearing loss in infants and others who are unwilling or unable to cooperate.
Traditionally, persons with a hearing loss have been fitted with a hearing aid, a device that simply amplifies the sound. Hearing aid may be helpful at any time in life and, because they are amplifiers only (and therefore make sounds louder but not clearer), they tend to work best in cases of conductive hearing loss.
For treating profound sensorineural hearing loss, a cochlear prosthesis has been developed to aid those individuals with little or no residual hearing. Alternatively, other means of communication may be substituted (e.g., sign language, lip reading). In some cases, all means of communication are used.
Objective 1: Hearing loss and its effects on communication
25-40 dB
Misses hearing many consonants, difficulty in auditory learning, mild speech - language problems
40-65 dB
Speech - language retardation, learning disability, hears little or no speech at normal conversational levels
65-90 dB
Voice pathology, aural language seriously compromised, severe learning problems
>90 dB
Profound hearing loss (deaf), voice-speech characteristic of deaf, severe learning disabilities
Objective 2: Hearing Assessment
Screening
Audiometric Testing of Adults
Threshold sensitivity testing using bone-conducted pure tones

B
C
D
Fig. X-1Objective 3:
Thus, the shape of the bone conduction audiogram is a measure of the sensitivity of the inner ear alone, while the difference between air conduction and bone conduction is a measure of the degree of hearing loss attributed to the middle ear. Figure X-1 illustrates bone- and air-conduction audiograms from normal and hearing impaired subjects.
Threshold sensitivity testing using speech
Speech discrimination testing
Auditory assessment of children
Objective 4: Objective methods for assessing hearing and hearing loss
Objective 5: Rehabilitation for Hearing Loss
[NEXT(Practice Questions)]